Statement to Restore Science-Based Policy in Government

Statement to Restore Science-Based Policy in Government

  • EOS News
27 Apr 2018
Signatory

The dismissal of scientific evidence in policy formulation has been particularly egregious in climate science (Source: Dave Ginsberg/Flickr)

Professor Kerry Sieh, Director of the Earth Observatory of Singapore, has added his signature to an Open Letter that calls attention to the dangers of human-induced climate change.

Signed by more than 375 members of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences in their own personal capacity, the Letter asks that the Federal Government recognise that scientific evidence and research is an important component of policy-making, and to therefore maintain scientific content on publicly accessible websites, to appoint qualified personnel to positions requiring scientific expertise, to cease censorship and intimidation of Government scientists, and to reverse the decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement.

The contents of the Open Letter is as follows:

STATEMENT TO RESTORE SCIENCE-BASED POLICY IN GOVERNMENT

By Concerned Members of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences

April 2018 

In September 2016, over 375 members of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) signed an Open Letter calling attention to the dangers of human-induced climate change. The letter warned that U.S. withdrawal from the Paris climate accord would have negative consequences for the world’s climate system and for U.S. leadership and credibility.

In the intervening months, these negative consequences have become more obvious. Human-caused climate disruption is leading to suffering and economic loss. Suffering and loss are not future hypotheticals. They are happening now. Despite these serious negative consequences, the present Administration has fulfilled its threat to initiate U.S. withdrawal from the Paris climate accord. The United States is the only nation in the world that has taken this action.  

The decision to withdraw is symptomatic of a larger problem: the Trump Administration’s denigration of scientific expertise and harassment of scientists. The dismissal of scientific evidence in policy formulation has affected wide areas of the social, biological, environmental and physical sciences. It has been particularly egregious in climate science. A recent instance of this is the intention of the Administration to assemble a “Red Team/Blue Team” to re-litigate all aspects of climate science. Such an exercise seeks to foster the erroneous impression of deep uncertainty concerning the reality and seriousness of anthropogenically driven climate change.

Scientific evidence and research should be an important component of policymaking. We therefore call on the Federal Government to maintain scientific content on publicly accessible websites, to appoint qualified personnel to positions requiring scientific expertise, to cease censorship and intimidation of Government scientists, and to reverse the decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement.

Category: